Job Satisfaction of Pakistani Speech Therapists in Various Workplaces: A Cross-Sectional Study
Introduction
There
is evidence that healthy employees are more efficient and that an ill workforce
costs the country more [1]. On two fronts, cost arises for SLPs: not only in
respect to the number of capable, effective workers but also with respect to
the impact a reduced workforce has on the health and productivity of persons
with communication and swallowing challenges [2]. It’s a difficult job, but if
you like complexities and challenges, a career as a speechlanguage pathologist
may be a good fit for you [3]. It has long been acknowledged that job
satisfaction is critical for therapists who work with communication disorders.
Individuals who are happy in their jobs are more likely to be efficient, do
quality work, report success, stay in their jobs, and encourage others to
follow in their footsteps [4]. Across occupations, job satisfaction is strongly
and indirectly related to stress and emotional exhaustion [5]. According to
John Locke, job satisfaction is a pleasant emotional state caused by the
assessment of one’s employment as allowing or attaining value accomplishment.
It was noted that job dissatisfaction was characterized as an emotionally
uncomfortable condition coming from an evaluation of one’s job as irritating or
as being incompatible with the accomplishment of one’s own job values or as
being a net loss of job worth. Cranny and his colleagues found that people
react to various perceptions of what they wish to get as opposed to what they
really receive [6].
A great amount of effort and energy is invested in the field of speech-language
therapy for evaluating the quality of life and treatment of persons served.
Many service sector workers give little weight to the quality of life of those
working as speech-language pathologists (SLP). Current research seems to imply
that employees today place the most importance on things like salary,
lifestyle, and job stability. The study conducted by Ruggero, McCabe, Ballard,
and Munro (2012) found that the average yearly turnover rate for academic staff
in Nigerian public hospitals was 16.18 percent from 1990 to 1997 [7]. According
to Felton (1998), certain professions, such as SLPs, who engage with special
communities and persons with impairments, are more likely to acquire job
dissatisfaction and tiredness [8]. SLPs’ job satisfaction has been linked to a
lack of technical supports, a significant caseload and work, and a lack of
money. Apart from an increase in years-at-position, age was found to have a
significant strong connection with SLPs’ high satisfaction ratings [9]. As job
satisfaction is so important in terms of performance and employee engagement,
there has been a rise in research in this area across a wide range of
occupations. Speechlanguage pathology is a field that can be found in a wide
range of settings. SLPs can work in numerous settings, such as schools,
hospitals, care facilities, rehabilitation centers, and private practice [10].
To date, the majority of studies on SLP work satisfaction have been conducted
in school settings. As a result, the aim of this study was to assess SLP work
satisfaction in a variety of settings and analyze the disparities in replies.
In conclusion, the study that has been undertaken on Pakistani speech and
language pathologist job satisfaction working in different employment sectors.
The following eight demographic factors were of concern: age, level of
education, amount of work experience, industry, workplace, and kind of
employment.
Material and Method
It was a cross-sectional study. A mail survey methodology was employed. One hundred and seventeen full-time and part-time practicing SLPs in hospitals and other sectors residing in Pakistan were randomly selected. Participants rated the Job Satisfaction Survey nationwide. To quantify total, intrinsic, and extrinsic job satisfaction, a survey questionnaire was sent to all the therapists. Included as part of the survey package was a 15-item Professional Satisfaction Scalle (PSS). Respondents were asked to rate their satisfaction on a five-point Likert-type scale, from 1 (very unhappy) to 5 (very satisfied) (highly satisfied). Data were statistically evaluated by utilizing descriptive statistics, as well as analysis of variance was applied to see whether there were significant differences. William Blank (1993) developed the PSS to investigate the things that make an employee feel satisfied or dissatisfied in their jobs.
Results
About the researchers’ survey, 67% of the university speech therapists responded. The demographics of the participants can be seen in (Table 1), which includes gender, age, level of qualification, length of experience, and where they work. (Table 1) showed that most of the participants were 25 to 30 years old, having a degree of bachelors and masters in speech-language pathology. It was also shown in the table that most of the participants had in the initial stages of their career experience as a speech pathologist, and most of them worked in special care centers. In addition to this, most of the participants have a normal workload, and their working hours consist of 6 to 10 working hours per week. Furthermost of the participants worked in the inpatient care department and had full-time jobs. For the purpose of viewing job satisfaction in different working conditions one way, ANOVA was run to identify the job satisfaction level of speech therapists working in different organizations as shown in (Table 2). One-way ANOVA reveals nonsignificant mean differences across the categories of workplaces of speech therapists i.e., hospitals (M = 38.25, SD = 6.40), clinics (M = 37.72, SD = 7.68), special need centers (M = 36.76, SD = 6.96), and schools/universities (M = 37.44, SD = 6.86) on scores of Job Satisfaction (F = .257, p > .05). So, it is found that organization doesn’t make any difference in the context of job satisfaction.
Note: SLP= Speech-Language Pathology.
Note: GD = M = Mean, S.D = Standard deviation, p = Significance level at 0.05 level, Degree of Freedom between Groups = 3, Degree of Freedom within Groups = 113
Discussion
This research was similar to others in that it showed speech therapists had modest levels of job satisfaction [11]. The results are in agreement with earlier research; in which speech therapists saw their correlations with job satisfaction [12]. Relationships with colleagues can affect both intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction, which seems sensible in light of the substantial role that colleagues play in the workplace. It was also shown that there is no difference in the job satisfaction level of speech therapists between those who work in speech therapy settings or in organizations. Since Watson (2000) discovered that speech therapists had dissatisfaction with their jobs and that such difficulties are outside the control of the working organization, this conclusion is consistent with this study [13]. Job satisfaction was correlated with age and educational level, according to this research. Educational level was linked to both intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction, with extrinsic job satisfaction also being linked to age. The results of earlier studies support this finding [14]. Previous research by Heritage, Quail, and Cocks (2019) found that administrators were satisfied with the extrinsic features of their jobs, such as benefits and work setting, at considerably greater levels than professors, hourly workers, or salaried workers [15].
Overall and extrinsic job satisfaction was considerably greater among employees
older than age 50 than those in the other three groups (ages 20–30, 31–40, and
41–50). Similar to the finding of McLaughlin, Adamson, Lincoln, Pallant, and
Cooper (2010), which states that speech therapists in their 50s are most happy
with their professions, these findings are in conformity [16]. While age 50 is
the traditional cut-off for defining someone as too old to do an action,
studies have shown that people 50 and older have greater levels of extrinsic
job satisfaction. Length of employment does not appear to affect overall job
satisfaction among employees at the university. The results of future studies
on this issue might benefit from open-ended questions that explore elements of
job satisfaction in order to collect more detailed data, which will enable more
precise conclusions to be drawn on the precise reasons for provided replies.
Additional to this, job satisfaction and its associated intrinsic and extrinsic
characteristics might be explored in connection to other, less-investigated
variables, including communication, meaning, remuneration, and promotion
regulations, as well as the potential to have an influence on the business.
Conclusion
Finally, there is a clear need for a better understanding of the influence of several risk variables on SLP satisfaction and wellbeing. The demand for further research in which theory is a central consideration and longitudinal data is required to discover the link between a predictor and an outcome is pressing.
For more Articles on : https://biomedres01.blogspot.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.