Friday, February 12, 2021

Simultaneous Triple Primary Neoplasms in the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Rare Case Report

Simultaneous Triple Primary Neoplasms in the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Rare Case Report


Background
Multiple primary neoplasms (MPNs) were not recognized until the 1890s [1]. MPNs were first defined by Warren and Gates in 1932 [2]. The diagnostic criteria for MPNs are as follows:
a) at least two neoplasms are detected in an individual patient;
b) each neoplasm has its identified pathology;
c) the possibility of one being a metastasis of the other must be ruled out.
In 1961, Moertel [3] proposed that if MPNs are diagnosed within 6 months, they are simultaneous MPNs; if MPNs are diagnosed with a time interval more than 6 months, they are metachronous MPNs. Today, the diagnosis of MPNs has become more precise due to the development of imaging equipment and pathology examinations [4]. The incidence of MPNs in cancer patients is estimated to be 0.5% to 10% [5]. The majority of MPNs are metachronous double primary neoplasms, while simultaneous triple and quadruple primary neoplasms are much rarer [6]. In this report, we provide a rare case of simultaneous triple primary adenocarcinomas of the ascending colon, transverse colon, and appendix.

Case Presentation
TA 78-year-old female presented with lower abdominal pain in the right upper quadrant of 2 months duration without remarkable previous disease histories. The abdominal pain was paroxysmal with nausea and vomiting and the pain relieved spontaneously. The serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (185.83 ug/L) was significantly higher than the normal range (0-5 ug/L). No member in her family was ever diagnosed with neoplasm. The patient reported a 5 kg weight loss in the past three months. Physical examination revealed pain on palpation of the right upper abdomen. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan with intravenous contrast scan (Figure 1) showed multiple soft tissue masses in the hepatic flexure of the ascending colon and transverse colon, and a 2.8 × 2.8 cm soft tissue mass in the right ileocecal appendix. A large mass was found in her transverse colon by enteroscopic examination (Figure 2). Colonoscopy and biopsy revealed a tubulovillous adenoma in the transverse colon (Figure 3).

Figure 1: Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scan CT reveals marked bowel-wall thickening of the ascending colon (A) and the transverse colon (B), and the appendix (C) is markedly enlarged.
biomedres-openaccess-journal-bjstr
Figure 2: Enteroscopy shows a large mass in the transverse colon.
biomedres-openaccess-journal-bjstr
Figure 3: Histopathology of colonoscopy samples shows villous-tubular adenomas in the transverse colon. (magnification × 200).
biomedres-openaccess-journal-bjstr
After multidisciplinary discussion, a laparoscopic radical extended right hemicolectomy was performed. Surgical findings (Figure 4) showed a 6 × 5 cm mass in the hepatic flexure of the ascending colon and a 4 × 4 cm mass in the hepatic flexure of the transverse colon. The two masses, leading to incomplete intestinal obstruction, were 4 cm apart. Postoperative histopathology of the specimen from the ascending colon (Figure 5A) revealed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma infiltrating the intestinal wall. Moreover, the mass from the appendix was diagnosed as a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (Figure 5B). The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient refused to receive postoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy or targeted therapy. The patient has been seen in follow-up every 3 months, and there has been no recurrence after 16-months.

Surgical pathology. Two infiltrating, moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas in the ascending colon (A) and a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (B) (magnification × 200).
biomedres-openaccess-journal-bjstr
Discussion and Conclusion
With the medical technology and equipment evolution, an increasing number of multiple primary neoplasms are being reported. However, MPNs are still rare, accounting for about 0.5% to 10% of the incidence of malignant tumors [5]. The etiology of MPNs is still unclear and is generally considered to be the result of multiple carcinogenic factors. Possible etiologies include genetic defects [7,8], medical treatment-related factors [9], environmental factors [10], and unhealthy living habits [11]. Pickled foods contain N-nitrosodimethylamine and other volatile N-nitroso compounds that show mutagenicity and carcinogenicity [12-14]. In this case, the patient had a diet high in salty and pickled foods. She denied using tobacco or alcohol and being exposed to polluted environment. The patient had no history of exposure to ionizing radiation or having undergone chemotherapy. No member in her family was ever diagnosed with neoplasm. Therefore, we suspect that dietary factors are the largest contributor to her MPNs. The treatment of multiple primary neoplasms is fundamentally different from that of metastatic and recurrent cancers [15]. Metastatic and recurrent cancers are mainly treated with nonsurgical palliative care. However, MPNs are mainly treated with surgery-based comprehensive therapy (radical surgery combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy).

For metachronous MPNs, appropriate treatment options can be selected according to the characteristics of each primary tumor, whereas treatment for simultaneous MPNs must be prioritized for those tumors that have poor prognosis, are directly life-threatening, or have obvious symptoms. The patients who accepted surgerybased comprehensive therapy had a longer survival time than the patients who accepted surgery alone [6]. In the present case, the patient was diagnosed with simultaneous triple primary neoplasms of the ascending colon, transverse colon, and appendix but refused to receive postoperative adjuvant therapy. Therefore, laparoscopic radical extended right hemicolectomy was performed. The prognosis of MPNs is better than that of recurrent and metastatic cancers [16]. In summary, to our knowledge, simultaneous triple primary neoplasms have an extremely low occurrence [17]. The exact etiology of MPNs is still unknown and we suspect that in this case, a diet high in salty and pickled foods was a major contributing factor. Surgery-based comprehensive therapy is the recommended therapy for simultaneous multiple primary neoplasms. However, exact etiologic origin of such MPNs needs to be explored further.

Highlights on the Selective CDK4/6 Inhibitors-https://biomedres01.blogspot.com/2021/02/highlights-on-selective-cdk46-inhibitors.html

More BJSTR Articles : https://biomedres01.blogspot.com

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Does Access to Remittance Improve Welfare Status of Households in Nigeria?

  Does Access to Remittance Improve Welfare Status of Households in Nigeria? Introduction Remittance is defined as the proportion of migrant...