The New and Effective Methods for Removing Sulfur Compounds from Liquid Fuels: Challenges Ahead- Advantages and Disadvantages
Introduction
Combustion of liquid fuels with organosulfur compounds
such as sulfides, disulfides, thiophenes and the corresponding
derivatives emits harmful gases SOx and NOx. HDS is main methods
used for desulfurization, but this process is inefficient in removing
organo sulfur compounds [1]. So recently, former techniques such
as adsorption desulfurization (ADS) and oxidation desulfurization
(ODS) were considered [2]. The main challenge of the ADS method
is the selection of adsorbents with high adsorption capacity and
selectivity [3]. Vafaee, et al. [4], synthesized nanosorbents of (A: Ni,
CO & Mg) AFe2O4-SiO2 by an auto-combustion sol-gel method and
used them in the ADS process. Also, Vafaee, et al. [5] used NiFe2O4-
Polyethylene glycol catalyst for ultrasound assisted oxidative
desulfurization (UAOD) process using central composite design
(CCD) under response surface methodology (RSM). Consequently,
ferrites in the adsorbent and phase transfer catalyst were easily
separated and recycled via magnetic field for desulfurization
process.
Conclusion
In this study, efficiency of ADS and UAOD methods with the
AFe2O4-SiO2 (A: Ni, Co & Mg) nanoadsorbent and NiFe2O4-PEG
phase transfer nanocatalysts were reviewed. In the UAOD process,
increasing the temperature and oxidant amount had the greatest
effect on increasing the percentage of DBT conversion. In addition,
one of the main challenges of ADS and UAOD methods is the use of
adsorbents and phase transfer catalysts with easy separation and
recovery capabilities. Therefore, using the magnetic field caused by
ferrites in the adsorbent and phase transfer catalyst structure, they
were easily separated and recycled after desulfurization.
For more Articles on : https://biomedres01.blogspot.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.