Abstract
In the ancient Greek culture and #philosophy statements about the world
had cosmological and #cosmogonic character. The first were totally (like,
for example, in Thales', #Anaximander's, Heraclitus' philosophy) or
partially connected with inductive assumptions (e.g. in Pythagoreans',
Plato’s or Aristotle's statements). On the other hand, the second had
always metaphysical (that is, mythical) nature of religious (like in
#Orphism), quasi-religious (like in #Pythagoreanism) or secular (like in
views of Plato - in spite of the fact that he referred to religious
myths - as well as in Aristotle’s and #Epicurus' works) character.Thus, the pivotal aim of the first science (that is, the first
philosophy); of philosophical theory or, in other words, the philosophy
of the universe (cosmos); of theological astronomy or of astrophysical
philosophy - which simultaneously constitutes a specification of the
#philosophy of nature and an exposition of a significant part of
Aristotle’s philosophy of myth - is the proper formulation and
groundwork of the ideal (divine) foundation of metaphysics of the
universe.
For more articles on BJSTR Journal please click on https://biomedres.us/
For more Biopsychological Medicine Articles on BJSTR
Universal Assumptions of Aristotle's Methodology Related to Nature by Jerzy Kosiewicz in BJSTR
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.